Boston Celtics vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats: Complete 131–95 Breakdown

Full Match Breakdown from TD Garden

On November 12, 2025, the Boston Celtics vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats captured a dominant showing in Boston. Inside TD Garden, the Celtics set the tone early with disciplined defense and efficient scoring.

This matchup added another chapter to their season series, with both teams set to meet again on March 20, 2026 at FedExForum in Memphis. That upcoming clash will carry extra intensity after what unfolded in Boston.

How the Celtics Secured a Dominant Victory

The Boston Celtics defeated the Memphis Grizzlies 131–95 on Wednesday night at TD Garden. Boston shot 50-for-99 from the field (50.5%) and 21-for-51 from three-point range (41.2%). Memphis finished 32-for-95 (33.7%) overall and 10-for-43 (23.3%) from deep. The Celtics also won the rebounding battle 58–41 and recorded 34 assists.

Boston never allowed this game to tighten. Their ball movement created open looks, while Memphis struggled to convert even clean attempts. The +36 point margin reflects complete control on both ends of the floor.

How Both Teams Performed

Boston Celtics Performance Breakdown

Boston looked composed and aggressive. They attacked early in the shot clock and forced Memphis into defensive rotations. The spacing was sharp, and the extra pass often led to high-percentage shots.

The Celtics’ efficiency defined the night. Shooting 50.5% from the floor and 83.3% from the free-throw line showed discipline. Their 18 offensive rebounds created second-chance opportunities that crushed Memphis’ rhythm.

If you’ve followed our all match player stats breakdowns, you’ll notice a pattern—depth scoring and strong rebounding especially for Celtics, continue to drive their success.

Memphis Grizzlies Performance Review

Memphis had difficulty establishing tempo. Their 33.7% shooting from the field and 23.3% from three-point range made it hard to build momentum. Even when they moved the ball well, shots failed to fall.

The Grizzlies recorded 25 assists and 41 total rebounds, but Boston’s defensive pressure forced tough attempts. The minus-36 team plus/minus tells the full story of how one-sided this contest became.

Boston Celtics Top Performers Stats

1. Payton Pritchard

24 Points | 9 Assists | +42 Impact

• Minutes: 30:22
• Field Goals: 8-15 (53.3%)
• Three-Pointers: 5-10 (50.0%)
• Free Throws: 3-4 (75.0%)
• Rebounds: 6
• Turnovers: 0

Performance Insight:
Pritchard controlled the tempo like a true floor general. He shot confidently from deep and created clean looks for teammates. His +42 plus/minus shows how dominant Boston was with him on the floor. Zero turnovers in 30 minutes made his performance even more impressive.

2. Derrick White

20 Points | 5 Rebounds | Two-Way Presence

• Minutes: 26:10
• Field Goals: 6-11 (54.5%)
• Three-Pointers: 3-6 (50.0%)
• Free Throws: 5-5 (100%)
• Assists: 4
• Steals: 2
• Blocks: 1
• Plus/Minus: +22

Performance Insight:
White delivered balance on both ends. He scored efficiently and stayed perfect at the line. Defensively, his two steals and a block disrupted Memphis’ flow. He looked calm, confident, and in control throughout his minutes.

3. Jaylen Brown

19 Points | 6 Rebounds | Strong All-Around Game

• Minutes: 25:18
• Field Goals: 8-16 (50.0%)
• Three-Pointers: 2-5 (40.0%)
• Free Throws: 1-2 (50.0%)
• Assists: 6
• Turnovers: 2
• Plus/Minus: +29

Performance Insight:
Brown attacked the rim early and spaced the floor effectively. His six assists showed improved playmaking, and he kept Memphis defenders guessing. The +29 rating highlights his strong two-way influence during Boston’s key runs.

4. Luka Garza

14 Points | 7 Rebounds | Bench Energy

• Minutes: 17:10
• Field Goals: 6-8 (75.0%)
• Three-Pointers: 2-3 (66.7%)
• Offensive Rebounds: 5
• Assists: 1
• Personal Fouls: 3
• Plus/Minus: +2

Performance Insight:
Garza brought instant scoring off the bench. He dominated the offensive glass with five offensive boards and shot 75% from the field. His interior presence gave Boston valuable second-chance points.

5. Neemias Queta

13 Points | 8 Rebounds | Interior Control

• Minutes: 20:02
• Field Goals: 6-6 (100%)
• Free Throws: 1-1 (100%)
• Offensive Rebounds: 2
• Assists: 2
• Blocks: 1
• Steals: 1
• Plus/Minus: +27

Performance Insight:
Queta was flawless from the field. His 6-for-6 shooting showed elite efficiency around the rim. He protected the paint, rebounded well, and helped Boston control inside scoring.

Boston’s Rotation and Depth Impact

Boston’s depth made the difference. Sam Hauser added 5 points, Josh Minott scored 9, and Baylor Scheierman contributed 6 off the bench. Chris Boucher grabbed 7 rebounds, while Ron Harper Jr. hit both of his three-point attempts. The second unit maintained pressure and extended the lead.

Memphis Grizzlies Top Performers Stats

1. Jaren Jackson Jr.

18 Points | Defensive Activity

• Minutes: 23:17
• Field Goals: 7-15 (46.7%)
• Three-Pointers: 1-3 (33.3%)
• Free Throws: 3-3 (100%)
• Rebounds: 2
• Steals: 1
• Blocks: 1
• Turnovers: 3
• Plus/Minus: -28

Performance Insight:
Jackson carried much of Memphis’ scoring load. He attacked from mid-range and inside, finishing efficiently at the line. However, Boston’s defense limited his rhythm late, reflected in the -28 plus/minus.

2. Santi Aldama

14 Points | Versatile Impact

• Minutes: 23:35
• Field Goals: 4-11 (36.4%)
• Three-Pointers: 2-7 (28.6%)
• Free Throws: 4-6 (66.7%)
• Rebounds: 6
• Assists: 4
• Steals: 2
• Blocks: 1
• Plus/Minus: +4

Performance Insight:
Aldama showed effort on both ends. He filled the stat sheet with rebounds and defensive plays. Despite shooting inconsistently, he stayed active and was one of the few Grizzlies with a positive plus/minus.

3. Vince Williams Jr.

12 Points | Perimeter Attempts

• Minutes: 24:34
• Field Goals: 4-12 (33.3%)
• Three-Pointers: 3-10 (30.0%)
• Free Throws: 1-1 (100%)
• Rebounds: 5
• Assists: 2
• Turnovers: 1
• Plus/Minus: -17

Performance Insight:
Williams looked aggressive from beyond the arc. He attempted ten three-pointers but struggled to find consistent rhythm. His activity was visible, yet Boston’s defense forced difficult shot selections.

4. Cedric Coward

12 Points | Rebounding Support

• Minutes: 25:34
• Field Goals: 3-12 (25.0%)
• Three-Pointers: 1-6 (16.7%)
• Free Throws: 5-6 (83.3%)
• Rebounds: 6
• Assists: 3
• Turnovers: 2
• Plus/Minus: -19

Performance Insight:
Coward contributed from the free-throw line and added rebounding support. His shooting percentage dipped, but he attacked the rim to draw fouls and stayed involved defensively.

5. Jock Landale

11 Points | Inside Presence

• Minutes: 24:28
• Field Goals: 5-10 (50.0%)
• Three-Pointers: 1-2 (50.0%)
• Rebounds: 6
• Offensive Rebounds: 2
• Assists: 4
• Turnovers: 1
• Personal Fouls: 1
• Plus/Minus: -30

Performance Insight:
Landale provided solid interior scoring. He shot 50% from the floor and spaced out for one three-pointer. Still, Boston’s rebounding edge limited his overall impact.

Grizzlies’s Rotation and Depth Impact

Cam Spencer scored 5 points with 3 assists, GG Jackson added 6 points, and Olivier-

Maxence Prosper recorded 8 points and 4 assists. Memphis’ bench showed flashes but could not shift momentum. The depth gap between the two teams was noticeable throughout the second half.

People Also Read: Knicks vs Phoenix Suns Match

Statistical Battle: Celtics vs Grizzlies

Category	Boston Celtics	Memphis Grizzlies
Points	131	95
Field Goals	50-99 (50.5%)	32-95 (33.7%)
3-Pointers	21-51 (41.2%)	10-43 (23.3%)
Free Throws	10-12 (83.3%)	21-26 (80.8%)
Total Rebounds	58	41
Offensive Rebounds	18	15
Assists	34	25
Steals	4	8
Blocks	8	4
Turnovers	10	10

Boston’s efficiency tells the story. Shooting above 50% from the field and 41.2% from deep created separation early. Memphis had more steals, but they could not convert defensive stops into consistent scoring runs.

Momentum Swings and Game-Changing Runs

The turning point came midway through the second quarter. Boston stretched the floor with perimeter shooting and extended possessions through offensive rebounds. Memphis struggled to close out shooters.

Another shift happened late in the third quarter. Boston’s bench unit maintained intensity, pushing the lead beyond reach. From that moment, the outcome felt certain inside TD Garden.

Key Takeaways from Celtics vs Grizzlies Match

• Boston’s ball movement was elite. Recording 34 assists on 50 made field goals shows team-first basketball.
• Rebounding dominance (58–41) created second-chance points and limited Memphis transition opportunities.
• Memphis shot just 23.3% from three-point range. In today’s NBA, that percentage makes it difficult to stay competitive.
• Depth made the difference. Boston’s rotation players sustained energy throughout all four quarters.

For more complete NBA statistical breakdowns and matchup reports (interlink: NBA category page), you can explore our updated coverage hub.

Previous Meeting Recap Before This Game

Before this matchup, the last meeting between these teams took place on March 31, 2025 at FedExForum in Memphis, TN. The Boston Celtics won that contest 117–103.

Boston controlled that game as well, showing offensive balance and defensive discipline. That result now gives the Celtics momentum in the recent head-to-head stretch heading into their March 20, 2026 rematch in Memphis.

For more sports analytics and updated game coverage, explore Vector Digest.

FAQs

Final Thoughts

The Boston Celtics vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats show a clear and decisive performance by Boston. Efficiency, rebounding, and bench depth defined this contest.

Memphis will need improved perimeter shooting and defensive adjustments before the March rematch. Boston, meanwhile, looks balanced and confident moving forward.