Memphis Grizzlies Vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats

Game Night in Memphis

The latest Memphis Grizzlies vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats come from Friday, February 20, 2026, at FedExForum. This was a high-scoring battle where pace, shot selection, and bench energy shaped the final result. Memphis protected home court with authority, while Utah kept fighting until the final minutes.

With the next meeting set for April 10, 2026, in Utah, this game adds real weight to the rivalry. That upcoming contest could shift momentum in the Western picture. Here at Vector Digest NBA section, we’re covering the most updated and verified box score data so fans get accurate, fresh insights.

Match Overview: Memphis Controls the Tempo

The Memphis Grizzlies and Utah Jazz Match show a 123–114 win for the Memphis Grizzlies. Memphis shot 48.9% from the field (45-of-92), added 21 free throws, and dished 29 assists. Utah responded with 114 points on 49.5% shooting (46-of-93), but 24 turnovers proved costly. Memphis finished +9 in overall margin and looked sharper in late-game execution.

This wasn’t a slow grind. Both teams moved the ball well and attacked early in the shot clock. Utah actually shot a slightly better field goal percentage, but Memphis forced mistakes and converted at the line. That was the difference inside FedExForum.

Both Teams Performance

Memphis Grizzlies: Balanced and Efficient

Memphis played like a unit that trusted each other. They recorded 29 assists and had five players in double figures. The ball didn’t stick. Cuts were sharp, and spacing was clean. Their 63.6% free-throw shooting (21-of-33) wasn’t perfect, but they earned trips to the line when it mattered.

Defensively, the Grizzlies forced 24 Utah turnovers and grabbed 45 total rebounds. They also posted 15 steals, which shifted momentum several times. Watching it live, you could feel their defensive pressure build with each possession.

Utah Jazz: Strong Shooting, Costly Turnovers

Utah shot 49.5% from the field and knocked down 13 three-pointers at 38.2%. Offensive flow was not the issue. They moved the ball for 28 assists and secured 49 rebounds, including 12 offensive boards.

The real story was turnovers. Twenty-four giveaways stalled rhythm and gave Memphis extra possessions. Even with strong individual efforts, those lost chances created too much ground to recover.

Last Encounter Overview

Before this February contest, the two teams met on December 23, 2025. In that game, the Grizzlies defeated the Jazz 137–128 in another high-scoring clash.

That earlier matchup showed offensive firepower on both ends. Compared to that 137-point Memphis outing, this latest meeting leaned more on defensive pressure and turnover impact rather than pure scoring volume.

Memphis Grizzlies Top Performers Stats

1. Olivier-Maxence Prosper

23 Points | 10-16 FG | 5 Rebounds | 1 Assist

Minutes: 29:33
Field Goals: 10-16 (62.5%)
Three-Point: 0-3 (0.0%)
Free Throws: 3-4 (75.0%)
Offensive Rebounds: 1
Defensive Rebounds: 4
Steals: 2
Blocks: 1
Turnovers: 3
Personal Fouls: 5
Plus/Minus: +1

Performance Insight: Prosper was the most efficient scorer on the floor for Memphis. He attacked inside with confidence and finished strong in traffic. His 62.5% shooting gave the Grizzlies steady offense whenever Utah tried to close the gap.

2. GG Jackson

20 Points | 7-13 FG | 4 Rebounds | 3 Assists

Minutes: 27:52
Field Goals: 7-13 (53.8%)
Three-Point: 2-5 (40.0%)
Free Throws: 4-8 (50.0%)
Offensive Rebounds: 0
Defensive Rebounds: 4
Steals: 1
Blocks: 1
Turnovers: 3
Personal Fouls: 2
Plus/Minus: +11

Performance Insight: Jackson’s energy was visible from the opening quarter. He spaced the floor with two threes and attacked mismatches. His +11 plus/minus reflected his impact during Memphis’ strongest runs.

3. Javon Small

16 Points | 5-12 FG | 5 Assists | 4 Steals

Minutes: 29:27
Field Goals: 5-12 (41.7%)
Three-Point: 2-5 (40.0%)
Free Throws: 4-6 (66.7%)
Offensive Rebounds: 1
Defensive Rebounds: 3
Steals: 4
Blocks: 1
Turnovers: 2
Personal Fouls: 1
Plus/Minus: +1

Performance Insight: Small controlled the tempo and pressured Utah’s ball handlers all night. His four steals directly led to transition chances. He didn’t force shots and made smart reads when defenders collapsed.

4. Jaylen Wells

13 Points | 4-14 FG | 3 Rebounds | 3 Assists

Minutes: 26:48
Field Goals: 4-14 (28.6%)
Three-Point: 3-9 (33.3%)
Free Throws: 2-2 (100%)
Offensive Rebounds: 0
Defensive Rebounds: 3
Steals: 2
Blocks: 1
Turnovers: 1
Personal Fouls: 2
Plus/Minus: +11

Performance Insight: Even though his shooting percentage was low, Wells stretched the defense with three key triples. His defensive work and +11 rating showed he contributed beyond scoring.

5. Lawson Lovering

11 Points | 5-8 FG | 11 Rebounds | 3 Assists

Minutes: 31:42
Field Goals: 5-8 (62.5%)
Three-Point: 0-0 (0.0%)
Free Throws: 1-3 (33.3%)
Offensive Rebounds: 4
Defensive Rebounds: 7
Steals: 1
Blocks: 1
Turnovers: 1
Personal Fouls: 4
Plus/Minus: +4

Performance Insight: Lovering owned the glass. His 11 rebounds, including four offensive boards, created second-chance points. He anchored the interior and kept possessions alive when the pace slowed.

Memphis Bench Effort

Kyle Anderson added 10 points on 3-of-4 shooting and went perfect from three and the free-throw line. Cam Spencer contributed 10 points with 10 assists, showing strong playmaking control. The bench unit kept energy high and helped Memphis maintain a steady lead throughout the second half.

Utah Jazz Top Performers Stats

1. Isaiah Collier

24 Points | 9-16 FG | 5 Assists | 4 Steals

Minutes: 24:52
Field Goals: 9-16 (56.3%)
Three-Point: 2-5 (40.0%)
Free Throws: 4-6 (66.7%)
Offensive Rebounds: 0
Defensive Rebounds: 2
Steals: 4
Blocks: 2
Turnovers: 4
Personal Fouls: 4
Plus/Minus: -2

Performance Insight: Collier was Utah’s most explosive scorer. He attacked gaps and finished through contact. His four steals kept the Jazz competitive, though turnovers limited full momentum.

2. Ace Bailey

20 Points | 8-19 FG | 6 Rebounds | 3 Assists

Minutes: 32:50
Field Goals: 8-19 (42.1%)
Three-Point: 2-9 (22.2%)
Free Throws: 2-3 (66.7%)
Offensive Rebounds: 3
Defensive Rebounds: 3
Steals: 0
Blocks: 1
Turnovers: 3
Personal Fouls: 3
Plus/Minus: -3

Performance Insight: Bailey stayed aggressive despite defensive pressure. He created his own looks and battled on the boards. His inside scoring kept Utah within reach in the third quarter.

3. Kyle Filipowski

20 Points | 9-13 FG | 6 Rebounds | 4 Assists

Minutes: 28:14
Field Goals: 9-13 (69.2%)
Three-Point: 1-2 (50.0%)
Free Throws: 1-1 (100%)
Offensive Rebounds: 1
Defensive Rebounds: 5
Steals: 2
Blocks: 2
Turnovers: 5
Personal Fouls: 4
Plus/Minus: -12

Performance Insight: Filipowski was highly efficient offensively, shooting nearly 70%. He scored in the paint and stepped out for a three. However, five turnovers hurt Utah during key stretches.

4. Blake Hinson

13 Points | 5-6 FG | 4 Rebounds

Minutes: 16:04
Field Goals: 5-6 (83.3%)
Three-Point: 3-3 (100%)
Free Throws: 0-0 (0.0%)
Offensive Rebounds: 1
Defensive Rebounds: 3
Steals: 0
Blocks: 0
Turnovers: 0
Personal Fouls: 1
Plus/Minus: -14

Performance Insight: Hinson provided instant offense off the bench. His perfect 3-for-3 shooting from deep sparked short scoring bursts. He was efficient but played limited minutes.

5. Brice Sensabaugh

9 Points | 4-12 FG | 4 Rebounds | 3 Assists

Minutes: 19:18
Field Goals: 4-12 (33.3%)
Three-Point: 1-4 (25.0%)
Free Throws: 0-0 (0.0%)
Offensive Rebounds: 1
Defensive Rebounds: 3
Steals: 0
Blocks: 0
Turnovers: 3
Personal Fouls: 2
Plus/Minus: -13

Performance Insight: Sensabaugh stayed active on the wing and contributed across multiple areas. While his shooting was inconsistent, he helped with ball movement and spacing.

Utah Jazz Bench Effort

Oscar Tshiebwe added six rebounds in just 14 minutes. Kevin Love chipped in six points on perfect shooting, including two made threes. John Konchar also contributed four steals and steady perimeter defense, showing depth even in a losing effort.

You May Have Missed: Oklahoma City Thunder vs LA Clippers Match Player Stats

Comparative Boxscore Analysis

Category	Memphis Grizzlies	Utah Jazz
Field Goals	45-92 (48.9%)	46-93 (49.5%)
3-Point Shooting	12-33 (36.4%)	13-34 (38.2%)
Free Throws	21-33 (63.6%)	9-16 (56.3%)
Total Rebounds	45	49
Offensive Rebounds	11	12
Assists	29	28
Steals	15	11
Blocks	6	6
Turnovers	17	24
Personal Fouls	16	24

Memphis did not dominate every statistical column, but they controlled the most important one — turnovers. Utah shot slightly better from the field and grabbed more rebounds, yet 24 turnovers shifted the game. Memphis converted those extra chances and stayed composed late.

Game Flow & Momentum Analysis

The turning point came during the late third quarter when Memphis forced consecutive steals and pushed the pace. That stretch created separation. Utah answered with perimeter shooting, but each comeback attempt stalled due to giveaways.

Another key moment was Memphis’ ball movement in the fourth quarter. With 29 total assists, they trusted the extra pass. That composure helped seal the 123–114 win and strengthened their recent run in match player stats coverage.

Key Takeaways from This Match

Memphis capitalized on Utah’s 24 turnovers.
Balanced scoring gave the Grizzlies five double-digit contributors.
Utah’s 49.5% shooting was efficient but overshadowed by mistakes.
Free-throw volume (33 attempts for Memphis) created separation.
Defensive pressure from Memphis guards changed the tempo.

This edition of Utah Jazz vs Memphis Grizzlies Match shows how efficiency alone doesn’t guarantee a win. Discipline and possession control mattered more.

Looking Ahead: April 10, 2026 in Utah

The next scheduled meeting between the Memphis Grizzlies and Utah Jazz will take place on April 10, 2026, in Utah. With this recent 123–114 Memphis win, the Jazz will likely focus on ball security and defensive rotations.

Home-court energy in Utah could change rhythm. If Memphis maintains defensive intensity, however, they’ll enter with confidence.

FAQs

1. What statistical factor most influenced the Memphis win over Utah?

Turnover differential was the biggest factor. Memphis committed 17 turnovers, while Utah had 24. Those extra possessions helped Memphis control momentum and generate transition scoring opportunities.

2. Which Memphis player had the most efficient scoring performance?

Olivier-Maxence Prosper shot 62.5% (10-of-16) from the field, making him Memphis’ most efficient high-volume scorer in this matchup.

3. How did free-throw attempts impact the final score?

Memphis attempted 33 free throws compared to Utah’s 16. That volume difference created scoring separation, even though Memphis shot just 63.6% from the line.

4. Which Utah player showed the strongest offensive efficiency?

Kyle Filipowski shot an impressive 69.2% from the field (9-of-13) and added 20 points, making him Utah’s most efficient frontcourt scorer.

5. How balanced was Memphis’ scoring attack?

Memphis had five players in double figures, showing strong offensive distribution and ball movement reflected in their 29 total assists.

6. Did rebounding play a major role in the outcome?

Utah actually led in total rebounds (49–45), but Memphis compensated with steals (15) and defensive pressure, limiting Utah’s ability to capitalize fully.

7. What does this result mean for the April 10, 2026 rematch?

Utah will likely emphasize ball security and transition defense. If they reduce turnovers, the upcoming Utah matchup could be significantly tighter.

8. Was this game more offense-driven or defense-driven?

While both teams shot near 50%, Memphis’ perimeter pressure and forced turnovers suggest defense and possession control ultimately decided the game.

Final Thoughts

The February 20 showdown proved that control wins games. The latest Grizzlies vs Utah Jazz Match highlight Memphis’ defensive focus and balanced scoring attack. Utah showed efficiency but struggled with discipline.

With another matchup coming in April, this rivalry remains competitive and evolving. Expect adjustments, intensity, and another stat-filled battle.